Data analysis · Modelling

What your data says, with the evidence in view.

We analyse and model data to answer a concrete question. We deliver findings, assumptions and limits your team can review.

01Clearer questions
02Relationships examined
03Better-informed decisions

What we have learned in the field

Half of any analysis is agreeing what each number means.

Sales can mean invoiced, collected or shipped. If that is not clear, any model built on top inherits the error.

01

Exploratory analysis

Before concluding, we check the boring parts: duplicate records, dates in another format, missing months. That is where the surprises usually are.

02

Relationships between variables

Two things rising together does not mean one causes the other. We separate what the data shows from what is still a hypothesis.

03

Statistical models

A simple model the team understands is often more useful than a complex one nobody can explain. We choose based on the question.

How we work with data

From scattered sources to findings in context.

We review sources, explore patterns and model relationships to explain what the data shows and what to investigate next.

01

Sources

Quality, structure and available data

02

Exploration

Distributions, relationships and outliers

03

Modelling

Hypotheses, assumptions and limits

04

Findings

Evidence to inform a decision

Conceptual schematic with simulated data. Associations are interpreted in context and do not demonstrate causation.

How we move forward

From a question to evidence for the next step.

We say clearly what the results show and what they do not.

  1. 01

    Frame

    The question and the decision it could change.

  2. 02

    Explore

    Sources, quality and relationships in the data.

  3. 03

    Model and explain

    Findings, assumptions and next steps.

A practical question

Do your reports mean the same thing by an indicator?

Two figures can differ because of their periods, sources or definitions. Before modelling, we connect each metric to its meaning so comparisons make sense.

A DECISION WE CAN REVIEW Source A Source B SHARED DEFINITION Period Unit Meaning
Conceptual scene · no client data or results

What your team can review

  1. 01

    An understanding of the sources

    Relevant data, definitions, quality issues and limitations that may affect the answer.

  2. 02

    Analysis and models for review

    Variables, transformations, assumptions and results documented to the agreed scope, so the team can follow the reasoning.

  3. 03

    Findings that guide the next step

    An explanation of patterns, uncertainties and further questions connected to the decision behind the work.

When it makes sense

When data is available but has more to teach.

Before automating, scaling or investing in another solution.

  • 01

    There is plenty of data, but it is hard to turn it into a useful answer

  • 02

    Different indicators seem to tell different stories

  • 03

    The team wants to identify factors associated with an outcome

  • 04

    A hypothesis needs to be examined before making a decision

Before we talk

A useful starting point.

We can start with a question and a map of available information. It does not all need to be organised beforehand.

01

Which decision needs evidence?

For example, understanding a change, comparing periods or investigating factors related to an outcome.

02

Where is the information?

List systems, spreadsheets or reports and who can explain their fields. No need to send them in the first conversation.

03

Which comparisons raise questions?

Bring indicator definitions and examples of differences across teams, periods or sources.

See it step by stepHow are data analysed and modelled?A visual guide from sources and quality to patterns, models and findings.

Let's talk

Let's explore what your data can answer.

Tell us the question and where the data lives. No need to send it yet.

Let’s talk